It's official, Obama is scared

Post by Bradley K. Sperman
It's official: President Obama is scared.

He's paranoid about what will be waiting upon his return to Kenya. I'm sure
the locals will give him a "warm" reception, heh, heh:
Loading Image...

https://tinyurl.com/pagoxtk
https://tinyurl.com/pzykmhl
https://tinyurl.com/nczkafq
https://tinyurl.com/ns8onwz

Dänk 42Ø

2016-11-06 04:59:34 UTC

Post by Bradley K. Sperman
It's official: President Obama is scared.
How do you know? He's getting desperate.
On Sunday, he said sexism is hurting Hillary's White House bid.
Yes, sexism. Because she's a woman. This, from some no-name guy
who stole a woman's job eight years ago. Remember that? Everyone
knew Hillary, no one knew him. Yet he just cut in front of her.
Why? Sexism, obviously. And, back then, being the first black
trumped being the first female. Lucky for them, no transgendered
Native American was running or both of their clocks would have
been cleaned.

Hmm... You may be right. Obama's success (in the election) is
certainly attributable to reverse-racism -- people voted for
him BECAUSE he was black. White people, that is: Obama
enjoyed the same popularity among blacks as Al Gore, so it was
they who truly didn't care about his race.

As for Hillary, sexism didn't hurt her, reverse-sexism didn't
help her. Unlike white liberals who voted for a black man to
prove they aren't racist, men of any color won't vote for
Hillary just to prove they aren't sexist. Most Americans don't
care about her gender, and it is SHE who exploits the woman
card to get votes from women who really aren't all that fond
of her. In fact, many feminists dislike her because she has
betrayed feminism, first by adopting her husband's name to
help his career, then riding his coat-tails to power. Not
that she isn't competent, but the way she got to where she
is degrades the feminist philosophy.

But she wasn't riding her husband's coat-tails when she was a
successful defense attorney. Jurors weren't taking her words
less seriously when they acquitted her clients. She was a
very competent attorney, and COULD have risen to power on her
own merits, but I think that a woman from her generation would
still have felt a bit insecure at that time, which is why she
chose the coat-tails approach rather than risk hitting a
glass ceiling. My and later generations pay far less
attention to gender professionally, and Hillary always had it
in her to be a ruthless, conniving bitch to rise to the top
on her own merits alone.

FPP

2016-11-06 06:40:19 UTC

Obama's success (in the election) is certainly attributable to
reverse-racism -- people voted for him BECAUSE he was black.

Brilliant and logical.

So what was the reason they re-elected him. Was it because he was still black?

--
"How will History judge America if it elects a madman because his
opponent used work email at home?"
There is no equivalence between Ms. Clinton’s wrongs and Mr. Trump’s
manifest unfitness for office. -Nicholas Thompson/Washington Post

Dänk 42Ø

2016-11-07 02:09:19 UTC

Obama's success (in the election) is certainly attributable to
reverse-racism -- people voted for him BECAUSE he was black.

Brilliant and logical.
So what was the reason they re-elected him. Was it because he was still black?

Possibly. And possibly because Americans still had the trauma of GWB's
administration in their mind, and by the time of the end of his regime
things had already hit rock-bottom, so under Chairman Obama's regime
there was no where to go but up. Whether he can take credit for it is
debatable, since presidents are not economic gods. His opponent was
uninspiring as well, and being a douche who sucked GWB's ass all those
years, plus being a Mormon (which even arch-conservative evangelicals
loathe, because they view them as devil worshipers) did not help.

By that time I think race had ceased to become a factor. The former
Teleprompter Autonomon started to take on a life of its own, while
Mitt Romney, like the rest of the Stepford People, remained soulless.

In this election race is a factor, since the Republican candidate is
orange. I know, he is technically caucasian, but like that former
caucasian head of the NAACP who dyed herself black with shoe polish,
he "feels" orange, so that makes him so according to leftist dogma.
Hillary is just a plain old white woman, her worst body modification
was dying her brown hair blonde before it turned gray with age.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
"My dream of an apocalypse that was the Antichrist Superstar
has unfolded. The people of Utah looked and acted like human
beings, but they had lost their souls. They were Mechanical
Animals."

-- Marilyn Manson (slightly edited)

FPP

2016-11-07 03:16:46 UTC

Obama's success (in the election) is certainly attributable to
reverse-racism -- people voted for him BECAUSE he was black.

Brilliant and logical.
So what was the reason they re-elected him. Was it because he was still black?

Possibly. And possibly because Americans still had the trauma of GWB's
administration in their mind, and by the time of the end of his regime
things had already hit rock-bottom, so under Chairman Obama's regime
there was no where to go but up. Whether he can take credit for it is
debatable, since presidents are not economic gods. His opponent was
uninspiring as well, and being a douche who sucked GWB's ass all those
years, plus being a Mormon (which even arch-conservative evangelicals
loathe, because they view them as devil worshipers) did not help.
By that time I think race had ceased to become a factor. The former
Teleprompter Autonomon started to take on a life of its own, while
Mitt Romney, like the rest of the Stepford People, remained soulless.
In this election race is a factor, since the Republican candidate is
orange. I know, he is technically caucasian, but like that former
caucasian head of the NAACP who dyed herself black with shoe polish,
he "feels" orange, so that makes him so according to leftist dogma.
Hillary is just a plain old white woman, her worst body modification
was dying her brown hair blonde before it turned gray with age.

Brilliant assessment once again.
None of it makes a scintilla of sense, and is as batshit crazy as
anything I've ever read.

Do you have your excuse ready as to why Hillary won yet? I don't think
it'll top your last one, but I'n hopeful it'll be equally as
entertaining.

Not anywhere as entertaining as winning of course... but you'll just
have to take my word for it, I'm afraid.
I don't see you having that experience any time in the foreseeable future.

--
"When voters figure out THEY don't like a candidate, that's bad... but
when voters figure out that the candidate doesn't like THEM... well,
yeah..." - Alex Castellanos, Republican Strategist 11-6-16

Dänk 42Ø

2016-11-07 07:53:51 UTC

Obama's success (in the election) is certainly attributable to
reverse-racism -- people voted for him BECAUSE he was black.

Brilliant and logical.
So what was the reason they re-elected him. Was it because he was still black?

Possibly. And possibly because Americans still had the trauma of GWB's
administration in their mind, and by the time of the end of his regime
things had already hit rock-bottom, so under Chairman Obama's regime
there was no where to go but up. Whether he can take credit for it is
debatable, since presidents are not economic gods. His opponent was
uninspiring as well, and being a douche who sucked GWB's ass all those
years, plus being a Mormon (which even arch-conservative evangelicals
loathe, because they view them as devil worshipers) did not help.
By that time I think race had ceased to become a factor. The former
Teleprompter Autonomon started to take on a life of its own, while
Mitt Romney, like the rest of the Stepford People, remained soulless.
In this election race is a factor, since the Republican candidate is
orange. I know, he is technically caucasian, but like that former
caucasian head of the NAACP who dyed herself black with shoe polish,
he "feels" orange, so that makes him so according to leftist dogma.
Hillary is just a plain old white woman, her worst body modification
was dying her brown hair blonde before it turned gray with age.

Brilliant assessment once again.
None of it makes a scintilla of sense, and is as batshit crazy as
anything I've ever read.
Do you have your excuse ready as to why Hillary won yet? I don't think
it'll top your last one, but I'n hopeful it'll be equally as entertaining.
Not anywhere as entertaining as winning of course... but you'll just
have to take my word for it, I'm afraid.
I don't see you having that experience any time in the foreseeable future.

You seem to think I am a liberal and/or Democrat and Hillary supporter.
I am not, nor am I a conservative and/or Republican or Donald supporter.
I used to vote Libertarian, until that party began running Republicans
as its candidates. I'm not voting at all this time.

I merely observed that Donald is orange, just as Obama is black. People
stopped caring about his race, and many of his white liberal disciples
had begun to turn on him by 2012. For the first time in their lives
they truly stopped not noticing skin color (sarcasm) and saw Chairman
Obama for what he was: just another douchey politician in a suit who
will say whatever people want to hear.

Returning to the subject of George W. Bush: So far during this campaign
season I have not heard a single Republican utter his name. Why? After
all, he defined the Republican Party for eight years, and most of
Trump's most fervent disciples were also USA! USA! Bushtards at the
time. Now they pretend his presidency never existed, and that the
orange man running under the same Party banner will be different (but
he will, and not for the better). Take GWB, subtract the mental
retardation, and add the scruples of Stalin and you get Donald Trump.

FPP

2016-11-07 08:02:23 UTC

Obama's success (in the election) is certainly attributable to
reverse-racism -- people voted for him BECAUSE he was black.

Brilliant and logical.
So what was the reason they re-elected him. Was it because he was still black?

Possibly. And possibly because Americans still had the trauma of GWB's
administration in their mind, and by the time of the end of his regime
things had already hit rock-bottom, so under Chairman Obama's regime
there was no where to go but up. Whether he can take credit for it is
debatable, since presidents are not economic gods. His opponent was
uninspiring as well, and being a douche who sucked GWB's ass all those
years, plus being a Mormon (which even arch-conservative evangelicals
loathe, because they view them as devil worshipers) did not help.
By that time I think race had ceased to become a factor. The former
Teleprompter Autonomon started to take on a life of its own, while
Mitt Romney, like the rest of the Stepford People, remained soulless.
In this election race is a factor, since the Republican candidate is
orange. I know, he is technically caucasian, but like that former
caucasian head of the NAACP who dyed herself black with shoe polish,
he "feels" orange, so that makes him so according to leftist dogma.
Hillary is just a plain old white woman, her worst body modification
was dying her brown hair blonde before it turned gray with age.

Brilliant assessment once again.
None of it makes a scintilla of sense, and is as batshit crazy as
anything I've ever read.
Do you have your excuse ready as to why Hillary won yet? I don't think
it'll top your last one, but I'n hopeful it'll be equally as entertaining.
Not anywhere as entertaining as winning of course... but you'll just
have to take my word for it, I'm afraid.
I don't see you having that experience any time in the foreseeable future.

You seem to think I am a liberal and/or Democrat and Hillary supporter.
I am not, nor am I a conservative and/or Republican or Donald supporter.
I used to vote Libertarian, until that party began running Republicans
as its candidates. I'm not voting at all this time.
I merely observed that Donald is orange, just as Obama is black. People
stopped caring about his race, and many of his white liberal disciples
had begun to turn on him by 2012. For the first time in their lives
they truly stopped not noticing skin color (sarcasm) and saw Chairman
Obama for what he was: just another douchey politician in a suit who
will say whatever people want to hear.
Returning to the subject of George W. Bush: So far during this campaign
season I have not heard a single Republican utter his name. Why? After
all, he defined the Republican Party for eight years, and most of
Trump's most fervent disciples were also USA! USA! Bushtards at the
time. Now they pretend his presidency never existed, and that the
orange man running under the same Party banner will be different (but
he will, and not for the better). Take GWB, subtract the mental
retardation, and add the scruples of Stalin and you get Donald Trump.

So, basically, you don't like anybody.

We have people who get paid to talk to people like that.
They're called "psychiatrists".

Dänk 42Ø

2016-11-08 06:28:15 UTC

Post by FPP
So, basically, you don't like anybody.
We have people who get paid to talk to people like that.
They're called "psychiatrists".

Quacks. In a "Dilbert" strip Dilbert comes home from work and tells
Dogbert that today he learned to hate people in advance, to which
Dogbert replies, "It saves time."

FPP

2016-11-08 12:46:57 UTC